Information Technology and the personal computer have really changed the way the world works. The two big pioneers that took computing from a distant "techie-only" space and made it accessible to the rest of the world were Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Both came of age at around the same time (1975-77), followed completely different models of development, and had a significant impact on each other and the development of information technology.
Recently, I came across a rare interview that brought the two together to recount the "rivalry" and the contributions that each brought to the other and their common field. Here they are in parts (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
(and can I say that the interviewers are just plain annoying!! Barring them, its a great interview!!)
Showing posts with label Good. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Good. Show all posts
Monday, July 20, 2009
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
What makes a good water technology: A summary
We've now talked about the water problem, water decontamination, and transport/storage. I can now start blogging about different water technologies i come across.
Before I start going into technologies, I just want to quickly wrap up what I think defines good water technologies. They must address one or more of the following:
1. Accessibility: The technology must help collect, store, and/or transport water between the source and the end point of use:
2. Safety/quality: It must improve the quality and safety of water, particularly for human use and/or consumption.
3. Applicability (or Appropriable): It should address specific needs of poorer communities (whatever they are) including being easy to use, actually address a water problem in the community, sturdy, address terrain conditions, etc.
4. Affordability: It should be affordable to the people you are making the technology for. If its too expensive, then find financing options to make it consumable (does not mean you have to cut quality). What's the point otherwise??
Before I start going into technologies, I just want to quickly wrap up what I think defines good water technologies. They must address one or more of the following:
1. Accessibility: The technology must help collect, store, and/or transport water between the source and the end point of use:
2. Safety/quality: It must improve the quality and safety of water, particularly for human use and/or consumption.
3. Applicability (or Appropriable): It should address specific needs of poorer communities (whatever they are) including being easy to use, actually address a water problem in the community, sturdy, address terrain conditions, etc.
4. Affordability: It should be affordable to the people you are making the technology for. If its too expensive, then find financing options to make it consumable (does not mean you have to cut quality). What's the point otherwise??
Labels:
accessible,
affordable,
appropriate technology,
Good,
quality,
safety,
technology,
water
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)